Most 2nd and 3rd year undergraduates, serious about becoming lawyers, are quite rightly focussing their energy on application forms for law firms’ vacation schemes and mini-pupillages. I read that just over half of training contract offers are made to those that have completed a vacation scheme with the offering firm. What’s more they can be good fun, well organised and paid. They would also give students something to talk about in an interview.
However, considering the numbers of vacation scheme and mini-pupillage places available compared to the numbers of applicants, it can be even harder securing a vacation scheme place than a training contract / pupillage.
As the end of January seems to be a big deadline, I thought that I’d share a specific thought about something that I have noticed on some cvs / application forms recently – it’s about mooting. What I often see is a reference to the fact that an applicant has been involved with mooting, but never enough detail, which in my opinion is a missed opportunity. I see for example short references to “Member of the University Mooting Association” or “Involved with mooting”. What I can’t tell from that is what the applicant actually did – Watched? Organised? Prepared the case? Or actually stood up and made the arguments?
It would be better to proudly provide more detail, because it can really demonstrate some of the skills that are very relevant to the job. So if you were standing up in front of the “judge”, or preparing the case, then say so, add include a short summary of which side you were on, what arguments / cases you used etc, and whether you won or lost.
As I have mentioned before in previous posts, (i) by adding this detail, you are showing that you understand which skills are relevant to the job and (ii) as with a detailed summary of your dissertation, this is setting you up for a successful interview.